You might say it’s because Vishal made it. I might’ve known him 20 years, but that only just feeds the critic in me a wee bit more.
Cutting the long story short, I finally watched a Neil Simon play, directed by Vishal- it was his debut as a director on the big stage, however, he’s been into theatre for a longish while now (a veteran even- personal joke- but I had to say it! :P). On one level, the cast (4 of them) and the director had it easy- Neil Simon has just about the funniest things to say, which automatically generate a response from the audience. However, to their credit they were delivered well. I’ve not been an actor ever, but I can probably imagine the nervousness one may have if a joke was not laughed at, especially in a live performance.
One of the amazing things about Chapter Two is the fact that it has 4 characters, distinct, and the play spends enough time on each of them. This in my mind is a great deal for a viewer as the play teasingly touches the boundaries of fun and depth- cleverly- which is not as easy to show. To that effect, I felt Leo and Faye did a great job. While the funny lines had an expected response, I thought the parts where both of them had lines that gave subtle hints of disconcertedness were the real parts. Faye’s dilemma on not being able to sleep with Leo, her constant stray comments on her own marriage effortlessly camouflaged by an odd, defensive laugh, or witty quips, while still alluding to a something amiss in life, was layered but beautifully brought out by the actor and the director. Leo probably was towing the same line as Faye. His remark on “I haven’t ever made love to her (sudden pause), with the lights on” was extremely well delivered. I think I wanted to mention it also as I hadn’t read it with a pause myself. And that, suddenly gave Leo a new dimension. In Act two his almost monologue-ish talk with Jenny, I felt had lesser impact than the comic scenes.
Jenny, I think faced an unfair audience. She said “ept” and someone ineptly shouted back “apt” while we were pretty much talking “ept” there. But I guess that’s the peril of a live audience. My favourite sequence in the play actually was the time George and Jenny talk on the phone and consequently meet. While I thought Jenny quite easily stole the show on the phone conversation, the nervousness on meeting the girl the first time for a “look” was far better visible in George. In act two the heavy dialogues (especially from Jenny) which were probably several paras all at once, were rendered pretty amazingly. However, I felt there were times Jenny rushed through them (maybe it was a directorial thing, which I frankly didn’t quite get). George apart from going “oh-ho” once on stage (which is totally misplaced in a
Acting apart, I thought the set was very well done. The whole idea of having two different paintings to denote Jenny’s/ George’s apartment-while still using the whole stage- was a great one, however, the production guys probably didn’t pull it off as intended. The dark breaks in between were at times testing nerves. One as the play is very long and secondly because the paintings were sometimes put tilted, while a purse was left in a couple of scenes where it wasn’t needed. Lights and music were also, well slow to react. On this one scene the light guy perhaps forgot that the scene hadn’t ended, he shut the lights off and Faye stunned him (and the audience) by a “wait” (part of her dialogue) and the audience broke into an unintended laughter. This was pretty much a pity, considering how well the actors were doing.
However, the ideas on lights, background score, and the set (including the books kept in line with 70s
End of the play- I was thrilled that I watched it. The amazing lines brought to life by the actors will always remain etched in my head, exactly like this. The next performance will probably never feel the same.




usual continentals, bread-and-butter-kinds you discover the


